Legal Opinion
Ravida v. Stuyvesant Plaza, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
“In order to prevail on its motion for summary judgment, defendant was required to establish that it maintained the premises in a reasonably safe condition and neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition” (Managault v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 62 AD3d 1196, 1197 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Stewart v Canton-Potsdam Hosp. Found., Inc., 79 AD3d 1406, 1406-1407 [2010]). It is uncontested that defendant met its threshold burden. Proof in support of its motion included, among other things, deposition testimony from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Managault v. Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Stewart v. Canton-Potsdam Hospital Foundation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Cantwell v. Rondout Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Gonzalez v. American Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Brown v. Haylor, Freyer & Coon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drake v. Sagbolt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Calvitti v. 40 Garden, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Feuerherm v. GrodinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Drake v. Sagbolt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Jenkins v. Rising Development-BPS, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.