Legal Opinion

Babson v. Salisbury

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1920No. Civ. No. 2714PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This action grows out of the following facts: Guy H. Campbell, as the owner of an automobile, left it with A. M. MacKusick, a dealer in used motor cars, with instructions to sell same for five hundred dollars. MacKusick entered into a contract with Reese Brothers for a lease and conditional sale of the car, subject to payments therefor, the former retaining title and possession thereof. A few days thereafter he sold and assigned this contract to plaintiff S. E. Babson and at the same time made and delivered to him a bill of sale transferring title to the car, possession of which was retained…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siegel v. BaylessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Dowd v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API