Legal Opinion

Ammer v. Ammer

New York Family Court

Decided June 25, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony F. Bonadio, J.

The respondent, by his attorney, has filed a written objection to the report of the hearing examiner, which recommends that petitioner have judgment for arrears in the amount of $1,200 (Family Ct Act, § 460).

Respondent objects on jurisdictional grounds, arguing that an application for a judgment pursuant to section 460 cannot be referred to the hearing examiner since section 460 is not “one of the proceedings specifically enumerated in subdivision (b) of section 439” (Lamagro v Murray, 107 Misc 2d 579). Although this court and other Family Courts of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wein v. Comptroller of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. In re Todd H.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Pavich v. PavichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Dana A. v. Harry M. N.New York City Family Court · 1982
  5. Wasserman v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API