Legal Opinion

United States v. Winslow

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 2, 1912No. Nos. 113, 114PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Sidney W. Winslow and others were indicted for violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. On demurrers to indictments.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

[1] These cases came before us on

demurrer. They are indictments based on the act of July 2, 1890 (26 Stat. 209, c. 647), commonly known as the “Sherman Anti-Trust Act.” No. 114 seems to be less complicated by special circumstances than No. 113. We will therefore take up that first. It contains two counts. The first is based on the second section of the act referred to, relating to monopolies; and the second on the first section, which declares illegal certain contracts and combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade, and punishes “every person who shall make any…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Northern California Pharmaceutical Association, a Corporation, and Donald K. Hedgpeth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. Pulp Wood Co. v. Green Bay Paper & Fiber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. United States v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API