Whatley v. Carpenter
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating 'the foregoing facts.) A controlling question is whether the attorney who prepared the contract of sale at the instance of the real-estate agent represented the defendant, or whether he represented the petitioner. In other words, was the attorney authorized by the defendant to receive for her either the money or a check. The Code, § 9-606, provides: “Without special authority, attorneys cannot receive anything in discharge of a client’s claim but the full amount in cash.” As to the right of an attorney generally to accept payment for his client, see: Pease v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kaiser & Brother v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Sonnebom & Co. v. Moore Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Pease v. Dibble & BunceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Price v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Roland v. RolandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duncan v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953