Legal Opinion

Whatley v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1944No. 14959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating 'the foregoing facts.) A controlling question is whether the attorney who prepared the contract of sale at the instance of the real-estate agent represented the defendant, or whether he represented the petitioner. In other words, was the attorney authorized by the defendant to receive for her either the money or a check. The Code, § 9-606, provides: “Without special authority, attorneys cannot receive anything in discharge of a client’s claim but the full amount in cash.” As to the right of an attorney generally to accept payment for his client, see: Pease v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaiser & Brother v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Sonnebom & Co. v. Moore Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Pease v. Dibble & BunceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Price v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Roland v. RolandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duncan v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API