United States v. Vantine
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decision of the Circuit Court, reversing a decision of the Board of General Appraisers (G. A. 5,688, T. D. 25,330), which sustained the action of the collector under Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, 30 Stat. 151 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1626).
1Opinion of the Court
EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The merchandise in question was assessed for duty by the collector as woven fabrics of silk at the rate of $3 per pound under paragraph 387 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule L, 30 Stat. 186 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1669]). The importer contends that they should be classified under
“Par. 390. Laces, and articles made wholly or in part of lace, edgings, in-sertings, galloons, chiffon_ or other flouncings, nets or nettings and veilings, neck rufflings, ruehings, braids, fringes, trimmings, embroideries and article-! embroidered by hand or machinery, or tamboured or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Junge v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Baylis Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Michaelian & Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.