Legal Opinion

Cross v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1951No. Civ. 14924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The petition for a writ of mandate is submitted.

This case involves a dispute over the proper charge for the preparation by the court reporter of the reporter’s transcript on an appeal.

The facts, as disclosed by the pleadings of the parties, are as follows: Nancy Cross, the petitioner, desired to appeal in the action of Cross v. Tustin, She filed her notice of appeal, and the notice to prepare transcripts, as required by rule 4 of the Rules on Appeal. The court reporter, William R. MaeKay, estimated the cost of preparing the reporter’s transcript at $283.50, and this information was given by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darcy v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Summers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Chessman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API