Rider v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court, Ozark District; Jas. Cochran, Judge; No law of this State can be extended by reference to the title only. The statute must be re-enacted. Const. Art. 5, § 22. The act is unconstitutional and void. 126 Ark. 260; 92 Id. 155; Kirby’s Digest, § 2248. Confesses error. 64 Ark. 83; 102 Id. 411; 103 Id. 298; 49 Id. 131; 52 Id. 290; 92 Id. 155.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCULLOCH, C. J.
Appellant was convicted of violating a stock law in Franklin County and he challenges the validity of the special statute creating the stock district on the ground that it was an attempt on the part of the lawmakers to extend another statute by refer-' ence to title only without re-enacting the same at length. The original statute creating the stock district was Act No. 310 of the session of 1909,. which created a stock district in the Charleston District of Franklin County and prohibited the running at large of live stock and geese in that district.
The General Assembly of 1915 enacted a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harrington v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Watkins v. Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Common School District No. 13 v. Oak Grove Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Beard v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Farris v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Texarkana-Forest Park Paving, Water, Sewer and Gas District No. 1 v. State Use Miller County.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Hall v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- White River Lumber Co. v. White River DrainageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.