DiBlasi v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
In 1942, when the minor plaintiff, seven and one-half years old, was injured, Washington Avenue, between Fourth and Fifth streets, in Philadelphia, was 1001 feet wide. Each side had a sidewalk or foot-way 18 feet wide, leaving 64 feet between curbs. Along each curb was a strip 22 feet wide, paved and improved for vehicular traffic; the remaining, or central strip 20 feet wide was *183occupied by defendant’s railroad consisting of two sets of standard gauge tracks with the usual dummy between them. The tracks of heavy rail were set on ties in ballast; the dummy and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Erie & North-East RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
- Brobston v. Darby BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Reading v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Borough v. Chambersburg & Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Jones v. Erie & Wyoming V. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wyoming County1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamley v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950