Legal Opinion

DiBlasi v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1949No. Appeals, Nos. 194 and 199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

In 1942, when the minor plaintiff, seven and one-half years old, was injured, Washington Avenue, between Fourth and Fifth streets, in Philadelphia, was 1001 feet wide. Each side had a sidewalk or foot-way 18 feet wide, leaving 64 feet between curbs. Along each curb was a strip 22 feet wide, paved and improved for vehicular traffic; the remaining, or central strip 20 feet wide was *183occupied by defendant’s railroad consisting of two sets of standard gauge tracks with the usual dummy between them. The tracks of heavy rail were set on ties in ballast; the dummy and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Erie & North-East RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  2. Brobston v. Darby BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Reading v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Borough v. Chambersburg & Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Jones v. Erie & Wyoming V. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wyoming County1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamley v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API