Legal Opinion

In re Cheney Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to compel arbitration *653denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the question as to whether or not the contract was fraudulently induced raises an issue of fact which must be tried before the right to arbitration under the contract may be enforced. If the contract was voided by fraud, the arbitration provision therein falls.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  5. In re GruenNew York Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API