Kershenbaum v. Wool
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKLAND, District Judge.
The Judge presiding in the pretrial division of the court under date of November 4, 1952, referred to this court, now sitting in the Criminal Division, matters to be heard in the above cause, at a further pretrial session, involving this court’s former pretrial order of June 23, 1952.
It was the intent of the court by its order of June 23, 1952, to approve both the pretrial statement of the plaintiff and defendant, and by such approval to grant the leave to plaintiff • to file the second answer to defendant’s counterclaim. The better practice would have been for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arrington v. McCartyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961