State ex rel. Pyle v. Bessey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing claims for writs of mandamus, procedendo, and prohibition to compel a trial court judge to permit discovery and to conduct a trial on the issue of whether a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement exists between the parties in an underlying case. 1 Be cause appellant is collaterally estopped from raising his claims and the appellate court’s mandate was not patently and unambiguously disregarded, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On June 7, 1999, appellant, Walter D. Pyle, obtained a loan from Wells Fargo Financial in order to buy a used truck. Pyle also…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dzina v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Borden v. HendonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Borden v. HendonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Obojski v. PerciakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Jelinek v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. New Concept Housing, Inc. v. MetzOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Zunshine v. Cott, 08ap-347 (2-3-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Durkin v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2022