Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pyle v. Bessey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2006No. 2006-1115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing claims for writs of mandamus, procedendo, and prohibition to compel a trial court judge to permit discovery and to conduct a trial on the issue of whether a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement exists between the parties in an underlying case. 1 Be cause appellant is collaterally estopped from raising his claims and the appellate court’s mandate was not patently and unambiguously disregarded, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On June 7, 1999, appellant, Walter D. Pyle, obtained a loan from Wells Fargo Financial in order to buy a used truck. Pyle also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dzina v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Borden v. HendonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Borden v. HendonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Obojski v. PerciakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Jelinek v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. New Concept Housing, Inc. v. MetzOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Zunshine v. Cott, 08ap-347 (2-3-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Durkin v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API