Legal Opinion

Mincey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 1996No. 94-2495PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Judge.

In this direct appeal from a conviction and sentence for robbery, appellant raises three issues, one of which requires reversal and remand for a new trial.

A few days before trial was scheduled to begin, appellant’s appointed public defender filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, certifying conflict based on information only recently acquired. The trial court denied the motion, rejecting the public defender’s argument based on Nixon v. Siegel, 626 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and determining that the court had the responsibility to go behind the certification of conflict and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Hope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Nixon v. SiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Banks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Morales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API