Johnson v. F. C. Austin Manuf'g Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
This was an action at law by Charles Johnson against the F. C. Austin Manufacturing Company to recover damages for personal injuries. The case-was heard on a motion to remand to the state court, from which it had been removed by the defendant
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, District Judge.
The plaintiff commenced his suit against the defendant in the district court of Douglas county, Kan., to recover damages for personal injuries. At the proper time, the defendant filed its petition in the state court to remove the case to this court on the ground of diverse citizenship, at the same time presenting a bond for removal. On hearing, the state court declared the petition and bond sufficient, and ordered the case removed. The plaintiff now moves the court to remand the case by filing the following motion:
■ '“Now comes this plaintiff and moves tbis court to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Carson v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Stevens v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Jackson v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. TwitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. American Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905
- National Quicksilver Corp. v. World Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Kerr v. Modern WoodmenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- People's United States Bank v. GoodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1908
- Stadlemann v. White Line Towing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.