Legal Opinion

Valluzzo v. Valluzzo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant having obtained judgment for a divorce upon a cross-complaint, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal and request for a finding of facts. Pending the filing of the finding, the plaintiff made application to the Superior Court for an ordér directing the defendant to pay her a sum of money to enable her to prosecute the appeal and also alimony pendente lite, and thereafter appeared in court and was heard. The trial court, before the plaintiff filed her appeal from the judgment, denied the motions, and thereafter refused to make a finding of facts to enable her to prosecute an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. McElroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Russell Lumber Co. v. J. E. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Hiss v. HissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Mathurin v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Young v. Polish Loan and Industrial CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API