Legal Opinion

Farr v. Nordman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 90, Calendar 46,544Published

1Opinion of the Court

346 Mich. 266 (1956)

78 N.W.2d 186

FARR

v.

NORDMAN.

Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 46,544.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided September 4, 1956.

Floyd H. Skinner and Alphonse Lewis, Jr., for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Whinery, for defendant Nordman.

KELLY, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants brought action to set aside a tax sale of 2 lots, of which they were the owners in 1947.

In December, 1947, plaintiffs received notice that the tax due on the lots amounted to $12 and, in order to avoid a further penalty of 3%, should be paid on or before January 10, 1948. Plaintiff Evelyn Farr testified that she was unable to pay…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API