Legal Opinion
Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of Pinal
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 23, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 625PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
These extraordinary writ proceedings have been instituted in this court to prevent the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by the respondent-court. The appropriateness of appellate intervention by extraordinary writ is indicated by the cases of State v. Court of Appeals, Division Two, 101 Ariz. 166, 416 P.2d 599 (1966), and Buell v. Superior Court, 96 Ariz. 62, 391 P.2d 919 (1964).
On August 15, 1968, Kenneth Dell Kelley, an inmate of the Arizona State Prison, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the respondent-court, challenging the validity of his conviction of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brumley v. Charles R. Denney Juvenile Center of Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Bouge v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. LuederSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Anonymous v. Superior Court in & for the County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- McRae v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.