Legal Opinion

Moore v. Excal Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 23, 2000No. 2D98-4331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULMER, Judge.

Dr. Harvey Moore, the plaintiff in the trial court, appeals a final judgment granting his motion for attorney’s fees and costs, but in an amount below what he requested. The issue on appeal is the amount of attorney’s fees to which Dr. Moore is entitled. We find merit in his challenge to the trial court’s denial of fees for litigating entitlement to fees and reverse on this point.

Dr. Moore is a litigation and jury consultant. He entered into a contract with Excal to provide professional services. A dispute arose between the parties which resulted in three years of litigation.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. PalmaSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. DiStefano Const., Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. National Portland Cement Co. v. GoudieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fleet Services Corp. v. ReiseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Lubkey v. Compuvac Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API