Braham v. Fuller
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case presents the question of what standard for liability applies where a landowner’s activities on his land cause permafrost to melt and flood adjacent property. The trial court held that the “reasonable use” standard, previously applied by this court where damage to another’s property is caused by interference with surface waters, also applies where the damage is caused by melting permafrost, and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We agree that the reasonable use standard applies. We hold, however, that the grant of summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- McCavit v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990