Legal Opinion

Steliga v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 18, 1934PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lloyd, J.

The action in this case was based upon a policy of insnrance issued to one Teofil Halecki and which contained the following provision:

“The policy to which this endorsement is attached is amended to conform with the requirements of chapter 116, laws of 1929 of the State of New Jersey, and all laws amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto which may be or become effective while this policy is in force, as respects any liability for bodily injury or death or liability for property damage covered by this policy, but only to the extent of the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kish v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Reingold v. ReingoldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. LaPoint v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. WallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Fellippello v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API