United States v. Walter Earl Stephenson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from a conviction for fraud by wire in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1343. We affirm.
The refusal to grant a second continuance at the request of appellant because of the absence of a defense witness was in the discretion of the trial court, and that discretion was not abused. United States v. Pierce, 5 Cir. 1969, 411 F.2d 678. Similarly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence since that evidence, the testimony of the formerly absent witness, was merely cumulative and did not raise a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loyal S. Ledet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Gerald Ladd HershCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- William Alfred Reno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Flavis C. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Jose M. Rodriguez, A/K/A Tony, No. 30200 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Terry Ray UptainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Walter MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James Albert DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972