Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Earl Stephenson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1971No. 71-1438_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a conviction for fraud by wire in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1343. We affirm.

The refusal to grant a second continuance at the request of appellant because of the absence of a defense witness was in the discretion of the trial court, and that discretion was not abused. United States v. Pierce, 5 Cir. 1969, 411 F.2d 678. Similarly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence since that evidence, the testimony of the formerly absent witness, was merely cumulative and did not raise a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loyal S. Ledet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. Gerald Ladd HershCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. William Alfred Reno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Flavis C. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Jose M. Rodriguez, A/K/A Tony, No. 30200 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry Ray UptainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Walter MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. James Albert DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API