Legal Opinion

Satterthwaite v. . Comm'r of Beaufort Cty.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1877PublishedCited by 11 opinions

■County Commissioners ~ Necessary Expenses of County — Parties. This was a CONTROVERSY submitted without action under the Code of Civil Procedure and heard on the 17th of October, 1876, at Chambers, before Moore, J. Upon application of citizens of Washington and Choco-Avinity Townships in Beaufort county, the defendant Board of Commissioners declared that a free bridge across Pamlico river at the town of Washington, was a public necessity and a proper charge of said county.

Read the full summary

■County Commissioners ~ Necessary Expenses of County — Parties. This was a CONTROVERSY submitted without action under the Code of Civil Procedure and heard on the 17th of October, 1876, at Chambers, before Moore, J. Upon application of citizens of Washington and Choco-Avinity Townships in Beaufort county, the defendant Board of Commissioners declared that a free bridge across Pamlico river at the town of Washington, was a public necessity and a proper charge of said county. Lt was thereupon ordered that bonds be issued to the amount of $7,000, and appropriated for the construction of said…

1Opinion of the Court

PearsoN, C. •!.

“Who is to decide what are the necessary expenses of a County ? The County Commissioners, to whom is confided the trust of regulating all County matters. Repairing and building bridges is a part of the necessary expenses of a County, as much so as keeping the roads in order or making new” roads, &c.” Broadnax v. Groom, 64 N. C. 244, where the matter is fully discussed.

The defendants say, that acting as “the Board of Commissioners,” they were satisfied that it had become a necessary expense of the County to provide a free bridge across the river at Washington so as to relieve…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Herring v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Evans v. Commissioners of CumberlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Vaughn v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Black v. CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API