Legal Opinion

Meneice v. Camp Kadimah Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1945No. Appeal, 123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithbich, J.,

Plaintiff, a general contractor, brought this action of assumpsit against defendant to recover a balance due on two contracts. Defendant corporation, engaged in the business of operating a summer camp for children, negotiated with plaintiff for the construction of an outdoor swimming pool. A written contract was entered into whereby the plaintiff agreed “......to erect and construct upon the premises of the party of the second part [defendant]......a steel and concrete swimming pool, thirty (30) feet by seventy (70) feet, including all plumbing, pumps, motor, filter and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Medoff v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Morse v. MaurerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. West v. JarviWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Pietramale v. Robert G. Fisher Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API