Legal Opinion

United States v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 14, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

Two actions on bonds were by stipulation tried together. The stipulation provided for trial by a jury of one and for a directed verdict. Most of the facts are also covered by stipulation. The first suit involves a bond in connection with an income tax liability of one Jules Hurtig. The second involves a similar bond in connection with an income tax liability of one Samuel Hurtig.

In the first suit, it was shown that on March 12, 1921, J ules Hurtig filed an income tax return for the year 1920, disclosing a tax liability in the amount of $17,379.85, and at the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Bruce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. United States Ex Rel. Hine v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Phillips v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API