Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Countryside of Hastings, Inc.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 1994No. A-92-647, A-92-648, A-92-649PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sievers, Chief Judge.
The district court dismissed the petitions of Kenneth L. Thomas and Elaine R. Thomas on the grounds that their causes of action against Countryside of Hastings, Inc., a mobile home dealership, are barred by the statute of limitations. The Thomases brought suit against Countryside alleging negligent installation of a furnace in their mobile home. The Thomases each sued individually for loss of consortium and for personal injuries, and both Elaine and Kenneth sued for physical damages to the mobile home. These three actions have been consolidated for purposes of this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Jones v. AbrianiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lincoln Grain, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Duffee v. JudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Records v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Thomas v. Countryside of Hastings, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Opinion No. (2003), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2003
- The Neenan Company, LLLP v. Gerhold Concrete Company, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2020