Legal Opinion

Anthony v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1931No. A-7888Published

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in tbe county court of Noble county of tbe crime of unlawful possession of masb fit for manufacture and distillation of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by tbe jury at a fine of $50 and confinement in tbe county jail for a period of 30 days.

The evidence of the state was that the officers found three barrels of mash, each of which was two-thirds full of whisky mash fit and ready for distillation, some empty barrels, a funnel, and bucket, a five or eight gallon stone jar, a fireplace built in the bank of the creek…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Reutlinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Keenan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API