Legal Opinion

Meyer & Associates, Inc. v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 2007No. CW 2006-1542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

|TIn this writ application, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana (Coushatta) urges that the trial court erred in determining that it had subject matter jurisdiction in this matter and that its Tribal Court, not the trial *932court, should determine whether the Tribal Council’s Chairman and/or his designee had authority to waive Coushatta’s sovereign immunity in a series of contractual agreements. For the following reasons, we stay this matter to allow the Tribal Court to make this determination.

Facts

Coushatta is a federally recognized Indian tribe with its reservation located…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer & Associates, Inc. v. Coushatta Tribe of La.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. State v. JoshuaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API