Kamp v. In Sportswear, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The assignment of a chose in action by a corporation to one of its stockholders, directors or officers who thereupon maintains suit in his individual name, pro se, is reasonably suspect as an attempted evasion of CPLR 321 (subd. [a]) requiring corporations to appear by attorney. The plaintiff-assignee here does not deny defendant’s averments that he is the sole stockholder, director and officer of his corporate assignor, and that the purpose of the assignment was to circumvent the statutory prohibition against corporations appearing pro se. Nor does he attempt to offer any explanation which…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Mercu-Ray Industries, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. BozarthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Traktman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Medical Facilities, Inc. v. PrykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kamp v. In Sportswear Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.