Feroli v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtShubow, J.
The plaintiff was injured while boarding a rapid transit train at the Wollaston station of the defendant carrier (MBTA). She was injured, she claims, because of the variance in height between the floor of the train and the passenger platform and because of the lateral spacebetween the platform and the doorway of the train.
The trial judge’s findings1 were as follows:
I find that on 6/2/84 as the plaintiff boarded a train at Wollaston Station, the floor of the train was approximately 2 inches higher than the platform and a gap of at least 6 inches existed between the platform and the floor of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Tobin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Molloy v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Martel v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- MacGilvray v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.