Sherwood v. . Hauser
New York Court of Appeals
This was an appeal from an order of General Term revers ing, upon the facts, a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. This action was brought to recover as upon a quantum meruit for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff for defendant, and for expenses paid.
Read the full summary
This was an appeal from an order of General Term revers ing, upon the facts, a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. This action was brought to recover as upon a quantum meruit for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff for defendant, and for expenses paid. The opinion commences with this paragraph: “ The General Term has reversed the decision of the referee upon questions of fact, and by this appeal we are required to review its. determination. (Code, § 1338.) It is, therefore, our duty to examine the whole evidence, and judge for ourselves…
1Opinion of the Court
Danforth, J.,
reads for reversal of order of General Term, and for affirmance of judgment, entered upon report of referee.
All concur, except Rapallo and Earl, JJ., not voting.
■ Judgment accordingly.
2Cited by31 opinions
- Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Henry McShane Co. v. PadianNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Betjeman v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- Lashaw v. CroissantNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- McConnell v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1895
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.