Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Spencer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1990No. CC 86-1253, CC 86-1288 CA A44858 SC S36409PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.

After foreclosure of a mortgage, after sale of the mortgaged property at a sheriffs sale, and during the time within which redemption could be made, the plaintiffs herein purchased the mortgagor’s right to redeem the foreclosed property, and thereafter redeemed. The main issue is: If a mortgagor, after foreclosure and sale, but during the time within which the mortgagor can redeem, assigns the right to redeem and the assignee redeems, are liens arising from unsatisfied judgments against the mortgagor/assignor, judgments that existed before the foreclosure decree and sale, “reinstated” 1 as to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Haskin v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Williams v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kaston v. StoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oregon Ex Rel. Director of the Department of Veterans' Affairs v. Hurt (In Re Hurt)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Cooley v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. John Latta Associates, Inc. v. VasilchenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp. v. HemstreetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. White v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API