Sirota v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Keith Sirota appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for posteonvietion relief. On appeal, Sirota presents argument as to only three issues. The unargued issues are waived. Hammond v. State, 34 So.3d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Hedrick v. State, *3156 So.3d 688, 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Doorbal v. State, 983 So.2d 464, 482-83 (Fla.2008)).
We affirm without discussion thé denial of all claims except appellant’s claim that ineffective assistance of counsel regarding the maximum penalty caused him to reject a favorable plea offer. As to this claim, we are bound by Morgan v. State, 991 So.2d 835…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Puglisi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Carratelli v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jessie Floyd v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State of Florida v. Keith SirotaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Santos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Keith Sirota v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014