Legal Opinion

Troy Laundry Co. v. Henry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Multnomah County: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Appellant brought this action to recover the sum of two hundred and seven dollars and thirty cents with interest on a promissory note of respondents, and the further sun of one hundred and seventy-five dollars with interest on an account for the price of a body ironer sold and delivered to them.

The respondents in their answer, after denying the allegations of the complaint, for a separate defense to the cause of action on the note aver that the same was *233given for the price of an extractor, a piece of laundry machinery; that the same was purchased under an express warranty that it would do…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line, etc., Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Griggs v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duff v. Willamette Steel WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Cypress Realty, Inc. v. BoggessOregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API