Legal Opinion

Burks v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 2, 1955No. 35668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The defendant’s plea in bar to the plaintiff’s amended petition was predicated upon the ground that necessary parties to the action had been omitted when the plaintiff amended her petition by striking two of the defendants. Code § 3-808 provides, “If a plaintiff shall be nonsuited, . . . and shall

recommence within six months, such renewed case shall stand upon the same footing, as to limitation, with the original case.’’ It has been consistently held that the renewed action must be on the same cause of action and against the same essential parties. Cox v. Strickland, 120 Ga. 104 (47 S. E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Sheldon & Co. v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Stevens v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Chapman v. Lamar-Rankin Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. COEN v. APTEAN, INC. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Timothy F. Coen v. Aptean, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API