Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Ohio Department of Transportation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2006No. 87619PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mary Eileen Kilbane, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellants, Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”), its director, Gordon Proctor, and its labor relations officer, Jim Miller, appeal the trial court’s decision to vacate an arbitration award entered on September 23, 1999. Appellants argue that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, that appellee, Edwin David Bailey, lacked standing to sue, that the trial court erred when it ordered a nonparty to conduct a new arbitration hearing, and that the trial court erred when it concluded that ODOT procured the settlement agreement, which was the basis…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. Lawrence Development Co. v. WeirOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Sarkies v. State, Dept. of TransporationOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wandling v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Braman v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. State Dept. of Transportation, 07ap-849 (3-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API