Legal Opinion

Holzman v. City of Canton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1913Published

Appeal from the City Court of Canton; the Hon. Harby C. Moran, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1912.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover for violating section 1, of article II of the Revised Ordinances of the city of Canton, which is:

“Article II.

Licenses eor Certain Occupations.

Section 1. Hawkers and Peddlers: No person shall sell or attempt to sell or offer for sale any goods, wares or merchandise or any article or thing of value by peddling, hawking or public outcry, within the city of Canton without first having obtained a license therefor, under penalty of not less than five dollars nor more than one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Zanone v. Mound CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Metropolis Theater Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People ex rel. Rinne v. BlockiIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API