C. W. Hull Co. v. Marquette Cement Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska; Page Morris, Judge. Action by the Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company against the C. W. Hull Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
AMIDON, District Judge.
The Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company was plaintiff below and brought this action to recover damages from C. W. Hull Company for the alleged breach oí a contract to purchase 50,000 barrels of cement from plaintiff during the season of 1907. The Hull Company, with headquarters at Omaha, Neb., had held the exclusive agency for the sale of plaintiff's cement in certain territory for three years prior to 1907. Early in that year negotiations were entered upon between the companies as to the business for the ensuing season. It was carried on mainly by correspondence and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Freeland v. RitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Collyer v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Crystal Palace Flouring Co. v. ButterfieldColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Yee GuckOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- United States v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Leaf v. CoddIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Finley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- Johnson & Higgins v. Harper Transp. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.