Legal Opinion

People v. Tutt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in resentencing the defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment of nine years, with three years of postrelease supervision (see People v Newton, 48 AD3d 115, 119-120 [2007]). Under the circumstances of this case, a further reduction of the defendant’s sentence is not warranted (see People v Medina, 81 AD3d 853 [2011]; People v Schreter, 50 AD3d 930 [2008]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825, 826 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P, Dillon, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. AlmanzarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. SchreterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FelicianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. UreñaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011