Legal Opinion

Druggist Cases

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1887PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson •'Comity. A. G. Merritt, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtBurton, J.

These five separate causes, inasmuch as they all turn upon the same legal questions, have been heard together. The defendants are retail druggists, doing business in the city of Nashville. The bills are filed by the State and the county of Davidson, for the purpose of collecting the privilege tax imposed by law upon retail liquor dealers for the years 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, and 1885. The bills charge that the defendants, during each of these years, sold spirituous and vinous liquors without taking out the license and paying the tax imposed upon retail liquor dealers, and that they are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
  3. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Lewis v. MynattTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. McCreary v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State ex rel. Stewart v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API