Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Global Landfill Reclaiming

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

111 N.J. 134 (1988)

543 A.2d 443

BERNARD LAMB ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

GLOBAL LANDFILL RECLAIMING, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY; BOROUGH OF CARTERET; CITY OF ELIZABETH; BOROUGH OF ENGLISHTOWN; TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO; BOROUGH OF METUCHEN; BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX; TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN; TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE; NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY; CITY OF RAHWAY; BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PARK; BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE; CITY OF SOUTH AMBOY; AND BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 2, 1988.

Decided July 19, 1988.

Thomas F. Chansky argued the cause…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. S.E.W. Friel Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. Lamb v. Global Landfill ReclaimingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API