Legal Opinion

Chmielewsky v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Canfield, J.), entered May 29, 1997 in Rensselaer County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to direct respondent to lift a parole condition imposed upon petitioners.

Petitioner James Chmielewsky was released on parole in October 1995 under special conditions which included, inter alia, that he remove the Rottweiler and three German Shepard dogs currently living in his residence. Chmielewsky complied with the condition but subsequently requested that it be lifted. When by letter dated November 2,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connell v. Town Board of WilmingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Van Aken v. Town of RoxburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Connell v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Gerena v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Saraf v. VacantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Moller v. DennisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API