Legal Opinion

Millstein v. Leland Hayward, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 25, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Defendant moves for summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The action is in two counts of which the first is for infringement of plaintiff’s copyright in the unpublished play entitled “A Lady Goes to Congress” by the defendants’ publication and presentation of a play entitled “State of the Union”.

Ever since Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 1946, 154 F.2d 464, district courts have treated motions for summary judgment in plagiarism suits with caution. But unless Rule 56 is to be completely nullified in this type of action, it requires…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. SylvesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Alexander v. HaleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Davis v. United Artists, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Costello v. Loew's IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  5. Malkin v. DubinskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API