Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Danielson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1962No. Crim. 8013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

In an indictment returned by the grand jury appellant Robert Carl Danielson, Roger Lloyd Schad and Patrick Joseph Reilly were charged in Count I with the crime of bribery, a violation of section 68 of the Penal Code of the State of California; in Count II with soliciting another to join in the crime of bribery, a violation of section 653f of the Penal Code; and in Count III with the crime of conspiracy, a violation of section 182 of the Penal Code. The defendants were tried by a jury and found guilty as charged. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied, as was his application for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. KobeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. SinshiemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HardemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. People v. CanardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. WintersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API