Legal Opinion

Bivona v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Plaintiff applies for leave to serve a late notice of claim. The application is made only on behalf of an infant plaintiff who is now fifteen and one-half years of age and who at the time of the accident was fourteen and one-half years old. The accident occurred on February 28, 1957, and this application (and the prior one which was denied without prejudice because of a defect in the papers) was brought on during the last month before the time to make such application would have finally expired.

Disregarding for the moment the merits of the right to recovery for the accident described in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nori v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Nori v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Bosh v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Lustig v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Samatin v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Claims of Poulos v. Union Free School District No. 1New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API