Legal Opinion

Janis v. AMP Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided April 4, 2002No. 3246 S 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELTER, P.J.,

Before the court is the motion for summary judgment of defendant AMP *146Incorporated, as well as the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff Michael D. Janis.

This is a case about an employment contract. Janis was an industrial engineer employed by AMP beginning in 1977. In 1992, AMP desired to send certain employees to its facility in Hermosillo, Mexico, to oversee its manufacturing operation located there. In June of 1992, Janis was interviewed for a position, during which, AMP provided him with a “summary of the policy provisions” which applied to his expatriate assignment.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Extracorporeal, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bigansky v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Rapagnani v. Judas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Luteran v. Loral Fairchild Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Kapustik v. Arnold City School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API