Legal Opinion

Luders Croissy v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 20, 2016No. 4D14-4092Published

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for tampering with evidence, possession of methamphetamine, possession with intent to sell cannabis over twenty grams, and use or possession of drug paraphernalia. He argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We agree and reverse..

The defendant moved to suppress “methamphetamine, and any other evidence, physical or testimonial, including statements of the [defendant, as being illegally seized without a warrant.” The court denied the motion to suppress, and the defendant entered a no contest plea to tampering with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Melendez v. Sheriff of Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Jonavon D. Gaines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API