Legal Opinion

Harmann v. Schulke

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 26, 1988No. 87-1289PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*851DYKMAN, J.

William Harmann, Jr.,1 appeals from orders granting summary judgment dismissing his claims against the Town of Dayton, General Casualty Insurance Company and Waupaca county. Harmann was injured when an automobile in which he was a passenger failed to negotiate a curve on Rural Road in the town of Dayton, located in Waupaca county. His complaint alleged that Dayton and Wau-paca were negligent in failing to post a curve warning sign and in failing to post a required forty-five mile per hour speed sign.

The issues are: (1) whether Dayton and Waupaca are immune from suit pursuant to sec.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. C.L. v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gordon v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Searles v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Bicknese v. SutulaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Tatalovich v. City of SuperiorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Old Tuckaway Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Envirologix Corp. v. City of WaukeshaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API