Legal Opinion
Mathis v. BE & K Construction
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 22, 1996No. 95-4518PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In light of the possibility that future developments may render the claimant eligible for permanent total disability benefits at some later time, we delete the words “with prejudice” from the first paragraph of the decretal portion of the order appealed here. Davis v. Bonded Transportation, Inc., 573 So.2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We affirm the order as modified.
Affirmed.
ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ„ concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. Bonded Transp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996