Legal Opinion

River Oaks Garden Club v. City of Houston

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1963No. A-9313PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

River Oaks Garden Club sought a judgment in the trial court, pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, Art. 2524 — 1 1, declaring certain property owned by it to be exempt from ad valorem taxes assessed by the City of Houston and Houston Independent School District for the years 1959 and 1960, and from those to be assessed in future years. The trial court rendered judgment so declaring.

The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment declaring that the property was not exempt from such taxes. 360 S.W.2d 855. We affirm the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Boyd v. Frost National Bank of S.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Morris v. Lone Star Chapter No. 6Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. City of Houston v. Scottish Rite Benevolent Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. Willacy County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hilltop Village, Inc. v. Kerrville Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Houston and Houston Independent School District v. Standard-Triumph Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. City of McAllen v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Davies v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1976

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API