Legal Opinion

People v. Monnier

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

Even assuming that this defendant called the complaining witness on the telephone and applied to her certain foul epithets which were overheard by the telephone operator, the defendant is not guilty of the offense of disorderly conduct as defined in section 722, subdivisions 1 or 2, of the Penal Law. Such a person must act or speak either with an intent to provoke a breach of the peace or in such a manner “ whereby a breach of the peace may be occasioned.” In the case at bar there is no evidence of an intent on the part of the defendant to effect a breach of the peace, nor are the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. People v. McCauliffNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. FeinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. People v. SchultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. People v. Reid, New York County Courts1943
  4. State v. BoyerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
  5. The City of Chicago v. TerminielloIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API